What is Section 111 IPC? Liability of abettor when one act abetted and different act done
Published on: Lawiz Team
Detailed explanation of Section 111 IPC: Liability of abettor when one act abetted and different act done.
Official Legal Text
When an act is abetted and a different act is done, the abettor is liable for the act done, in the same manner as if he had abetted it.
What This IPC Section Means – Explained in Simple Words
Section 111 makes an abettor responsible even if a different act is done instead of the one they intended to abet.
Purpose
To ensure that abettors are held responsible even if the crime committed is slightly different from what they encouraged.
Bailable or Not Bailable & Punishment
Bailable: Depends on the offence committed, Punishment: The abettor is liable for the punishment of the act that is actually committed, even if it is different from the one abetted, if the act is a probable consequence.
Scope and Application
Applies to all cases where an abettor encourages an act, but a different act is committed.
Important Legal Points
Abettor is liable if the resulting act is a likely consequence of the abetment.
Illustrative Example
A person encourages another to cause hurt, but they cause grievous hurt instead. The abettor is still liable.
Exceptions and Special Cases
Does not apply if the resulting act is completely different and not a probable outcome.
Conclusion
Holds abettors accountable even for slightly different outcomes.
FAQs
What does Section 111 IPC define?
Liability of abettor when one act abetted and different act done.
Where is Section 111 IPC commonly applied?
In cases involving liability of abettor when one act abetted and different act done situations.
Why is Section 111 IPC significant?
It provides clarity in handling cases under Indian Penal Code.
Can you provide a real-world example of Section 111 IPC?
Real-world cases involving liability of abettor when one act abetted and different act done often refer to this section.
Does Section 111 IPC mention any exceptions?
Yes, it should be interpreted in conjunction with other IPC provisions.
Is Section 111 IPC linked to any other IPC sections?
Yes, it complements several provisions related to criminal defenses or abetment.
How have courts interpreted Section 111 IPC?
Courts interpret based on statutory meaning and factual case situations.