What is Section 196 IPC? Using evidence known to be false

Published on: Lawiz Team

Learn about Section 196 IPC: Using evidence known to be false

Official Legal Text

Whoever corruptly uses or attempts to use as true or genuine evidence any evidence which he knows to be false or fabricated shall be punished in the same manner as if he gave or fabricated false evidence.

What This IPC Section Means – Explained in Simple Words

Section 196 punishes anyone who uses or presents any evidence in a judicial proceeding, knowing that it is false.

Purpose

To ensure the integrity of judicial proceedings by penalizing those who knowingly use false evidence.

Bailable or Not Bailable & Punishment

Bailable: Non-Bailable, Punishment: Same as if the person had given false evidence themselves, i.e., imprisonment up to 7 years and fine.

Key Elements

Using or presenting evidence in a judicial proceeding, knowing it to be false.

Legal Defenses

If the person can prove they genuinely believed the evidence to be true.

Judicial Interpretation

Courts focus on the knowledge and intention behind using false evidence.

Illustration

If a person submits a forged document in court, knowing it is false, they can be punished under Section 196.

FAQs

What does Section 196 IPC define?

Using evidence known to be false.

Where is Section 196 IPC applicable?

It applies to false evidence, obstruction of justice, and non-cooperation with public authorities.

Why is Section 196 IPC important?

It ensures the integrity of judicial and administrative processes by punishing falsehood and obstruction.

Give an example involving Section 196 IPC.

Examples include giving false statements under oath or preventing summons service.

What punishment is applicable under Section 196 IPC?

Punishment ranges from fines to several years of imprisonment based on offence severity.

Is Section 196 IPC linked to other IPC laws?

Yes, especially with laws governing evidence, court proceedings, and public duties.

How have courts interpreted Section 196 IPC?

Courts stress strict adherence to truth and severe penalties for falsehoods and obstruction.