What is Section 311 IPC? Punishment for thug

Published on: Lawiz Team

Learn about Section 311 IPC: Punishment for thug

Official Legal Text

Whoever is a thug, shall be punished with imprisonment for life, and shall also be liable to fine.

What This IPC Section Means – Explained in Simple Words

Section 311 prescribes the punishment for being a 'thug', which means a person habitually associated with committing or planning acts of robbery or murder for gain.

Purpose

To ensure strict punishment for individuals who are habitual criminals involved in violent crimes.

Bailable or Not Bailable & Punishment

Bailable: Non-Bailable, Punishment: Imprisonment for life, and fine.

Scope and Application

Applies to individuals identified as 'thugs' under Section 310, involved in habitual acts of robbery or murder.

Important Legal Points

The person must be proven to be habitually involved in violent crimes like robbery or murder.

Illustrative Example

If a person is found to be repeatedly engaging in planning and committing murders for gain, they are punishable under Section 311.

Exceptions and Special Cases

Does not apply if the person is not habitually involved in such crimes.

Punishment Details

Punishment may extend to life imprisonment or death, depending on the severity of the crimes committed.

FAQs

What is Section 311 IPC about?

Punishment for thug

What is the punishment under Section 311 IPC?

Punishment varies depending on specific conditions under Section 311 IPC.

Is the offence under Section 311 IPC bailable or non-bailable?

Depends on the severity and judicial discretion.

How can a case be filed under Section 311 IPC?

Approach the nearest police station and file an FIR mentioning the details.

What are the defences available under Section 311 IPC?

Defences depend on lack of intent, mistake of fact, or procedural lapses.

Can you give examples related to Section 311 IPC?

Real-world examples vary based on facts and circumstances.

Are there any landmark judgments related to Section 311 IPC?

Judicial interpretations vary; specific case laws define the scope.