What is Section 334 IPC? Voluntarily causing hurt on provocation
Published on: Lawiz Team
Learn about Section 334 IPC: Voluntarily causing hurt on provocation
Official Legal Text
Whoever voluntarily causes hurt on grave and sudden provocation, if he neither intends nor knows himself to be likely to cause hurt to any person other than the person who gave the provocation, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to one month, or with fine which may extend to five hundred rupees, or with both.
What This IPC Section Means – Explained in Simple Words
Section 334 punishes anyone who voluntarily causes hurt to another person on sudden and grave provocation.
Purpose
To provide lenient punishment for hurt caused under sudden and grave provocation.
Bailable or Not Bailable & Punishment
Bailable: Bailable, Punishment: Imprisonment up to 1 month, or fine up to 500 rupees, or both.
Key Elements
1. Hurt must be caused voluntarily. 2. The act must be due to sudden and grave provocation. 3. The provocation must not be self-invited.
Punishment Details
Imprisonment of up to one month, or fine up to five hundred rupees, or both.
Illustrative Example
If a person slaps another in anger after being insulted, it may be considered hurt on provocation under Section 334.
Legal Defenses
If the provocation was not sudden or grave, this section does not apply.
Related Sections
Related to Section 335 (Grievous hurt on provocation).
FAQs
What does Voluntarily causing hurt on provocation mean?
Voluntarily causing hurt on provocation is defined under Indian Penal Code.
What is the punishment for voluntarily causing hurt on provocation?
Punishment is according to IPC provisions for this offence.
Is offence under this section cognizable?
It depends, but often considered serious under IPC.
Is offence under this section bailable?
Bailability depends on severity and case facts.
How can a complaint be filed under this section?
Approach nearest police station and lodge an FIR.
What are possible defences if accused under this section?
Defence may include lack of intent, accident, or false implication.
Can you provide an example situation under this section?
Examples vary based on case facts.