What is Section 476 IPC? Counterfeiting Device or Mark Used for Authenticating Documents Described in Section 466, or Possessing Counterfeit Marked Material
Published on: Lawiz Team
Learn about Section 476 IPC: Meaning, scope, punishment, examples.
Official Legal Text
Whoever counterfeits upon, or possesses a device or mark used for authenticating documents described in section 466 intending to use it for forgery, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.
What This IPC Section Means – Explained in Simple Words
Section 476 punishes anyone who counterfeits a device, seal, or mark used for authenticating a document covered under Section 466 (court records or public documents), or possesses such counterfeit marked material.
Purpose
To prevent individuals from creating or using counterfeit seals, stamps, or devices used to authenticate important public documents or court records.
Bailable or Not Bailable & Punishment
Bailable: Non-Bailable, Punishment: Imprisonment up to 7 years, and fine.
Key Elements
1. The seal, mark, or device must be used for authenticating documents described in Section 466. 2. It must be counterfeit. 3. The accused must possess or use it with fraudulent intent.
Punishment Details
Imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and a fine.
Illustrative Example
If a person creates a fake court seal to authenticate a forged judgment, they are punishable under Section 476.
Legal Defenses
If the accused can prove that the seal was genuine or used with proper authority, they may be acquitted.
Related Sections
Related to Section 466 (Forgery of court record) and Section 475 (Counterfeiting seal of valuable security).
Important Note
This section applies specifically to documents described in Section 466.
FAQs
What does Section 476 IPC define?
Counterfeiting device or mark used for authenticating documents described in section 466, or possessing counterfeit marked material.
How is 'Counterfeiting device or mark used for authenticating documents described in section 466, or possessing counterfeit marked material' interpreted in law?
It is interpreted based on the Indian Penal Code and relevant case law.
Where is Section 476 IPC applicable?
Its application depends on the legal context and the nature of the offence involved.
Can you give a practical example for Section 476?
Examples include real-life cases involving counterfeiting device or mark used for authenticating documents described in section 466, or possessing counterfeit marked material.
Is Section 476 used along with other IPC sections?
Yes, it is often cited alongside related criminal provisions.
How do courts interpret Section 476 IPC?
Courts interpret it using past judgments and statutory interpretations.
Why is Section 476 significant?
It holds importance in the framework of criminal law.