What is Section 78 IPC? Act done pursuant to the judgment or order of Court

Published on: Lawiz Team

Detailed explanation of Section 78 IPC: Act done pursuant to the judgment or order of Court.

Official Legal Text

Nothing which is done in pursuance of, or which is warranted by the judgment or order of, a Court of Justice, if done whilst such judgment or order remains in force, is an offence.

What This IPC Section Means – Explained in Simple Words

An act done following the judgment or order of a court is not an offence.

Purpose

To protect individuals who act in compliance with court orders.

Bailable or Not Bailable & Punishment

Bailable: Not Applicable, Punishment: No punishment if the act is done in obedience to the judgment or order of a competent court.

Scope and Application

Applies to all lawful acts done pursuant to a court's judgment.

Important Legal Points

The act must be done in direct compliance with the court order.

Illustrative Example

A police officer executing a search warrant issued by a court.

Exceptions and Special Cases

Does not protect acts done beyond the scope of the court order.

Conclusion

Ensures legal protection for compliance with judicial orders.

FAQs

What does Section 78 IPC define?

Act done pursuant to the judgment or order of Court.

What is the legal scope of Section 78 IPC?

It defines how act done pursuant to the judgment or order of court is treated under Indian Penal Code.

When is Section 78 IPC applicable?

In cases involving act done pursuant to the judgment or order of court circumstances or actions.

Are there exceptions under Section 78 IPC?

It must be read with relevant general exceptions or contextual limitations.

Can you give an example related to Section 78 IPC?

Real case laws often refer to act done pursuant to the judgment or order of court in specific judgments.

Is Section 78 connected to any other IPC sections?

Yes, this section is often applied alongside related IPC provisions depending on the case.

How do courts interpret Section 78 IPC?

Courts interpret it in line with judicial precedent and legislative intent.